I have a server that operates 24.7. It occurred to me that I may be able to save some money on electricity bills if I could reduce its power consumption. It already has a low power AMD Sempron LE-1100 CPU so the power draw of the system should be quite low, mais l' PSU is quite old and not especially efficient. This got me thinking about Power supplies designed for low power systems. Il y a beaucoup de 80+ certified PSU« S là-bas avec 500+ watt ratings, but are these actually worth the investment for a low power system?
My system spends most of its time idle so I decided I’d work out the power draw would be if I were to build a new system with current components to do it’s job..
Base system (par exemple. atome ou Core i5) | 18W |
4x 2 To (par exemple. Samsung EcoGreen F3) | 19W |
RAID Carte (par exemple. Areca 1220) | 5W |
1x 120mm Case / HDD Ventilateur (par exemple. Nexus Real Silent 120mm) | 1W |
TOTAL | 43W |
Using the above figures, I estimate that a new system with a similar role and capability to what I have will consume just under 45watts at idle.
For a typical low spec (450w) PSU, cette charge est seulement 10%. At this low a load a typical PSU can be quite inefficient. le ATX specification requires 70% efficiency at 20% de la puissance nominale, mais un tirage au sort est inférieure à 43W 20% puissance nominale pour tous PSUEst évalué pour 250W ou au-dessus (en effet, tout PSU'S). Below is a comparison between a bare minimum ATX PSU and a few highly efficient PSU'S.
The figure for the generic PSU is based on the minimum requirement and is therefore a worst case. Even with a very poor efficiency PSU le tirage d'alimentation de la paroi ne sera pas augmenter à mesure que le tirage au sort DC diminue. I have calculated a best-case yearly saving, based on a kWh charge of 10p and assuming 24.7 usage.
Make / Model | Efficiency at 43W | Est. tirage total de puissance (tourner au ralenti) | Saving |
ATX v2.2 250W ATX | 70% (à 50W) | 61W | |
Seasonic X‑400 | 80.4% (à 42.6W) | 53W | 6,97 £ |
Corsair AX850 | 77.3% (à 43W) | 55W | 5,09 £ |
Enermax Modu87+ 500w | 77.5% (à 43.4W) | 56W | 5,21 £ |
Corsair CX400W | 73.2% (à 43.2W) | 59W | 2,35 £ |
Sparkle Power SPI220LE FlexATX 220W | 80.5% (à 42.4w) | 53W | 7,02 £ |
HuntKey Jumper R90 300W 80+ Gold | 85% (à 30w) | 51W | £ 9.50 |
Conclusion: For a low power system it is cheaper, and probably more environmentally sound to keep (ou réutilisation) an existing power supply than to replace it with a high power model, even if the new model is very efficient.
Mettre à jour (25-Dec-2011)
Corrected a calculation error and added the HuntKey Jumper R90. Even a very good value, highly efficient PSU can’t change the conclusion much in this scenario — the savings are just far too small to justify the cost (and environmental cost) d'une nouvelle PSU. Le HuntKey prendrait plus de 3 années à payer pour elle-même, and this is in an ideal scenario, compared to a a worth case scenario PSU! For an even lower power system (par exemple. AMD E350) the savings would be lower still. Even a “perfect” PSU would only net savings of around £16 a year!
“Hi James I realise it has been a long while, but I just checked this on windows 11 (build 23H2)…”