I have a server that operates 24.7. It occurred to me that I may be able to save some money on electricity bills if I could reduce its power consumption. It already has a low power AMD Sempron LE-1100 CPU so the power draw of the system should be quite low, mas o PSU is quite old and not especially efficient. This got me thinking about Power supplies designed for low power systems. There are plenty of 80+ certified PSU’s out there with 500+ watt ratings, but are these actually worth the investment for a low power system?
My system spends most of its time idle so I decided I’d work out the power draw would be if I were to build a new system with current components to do it’s job..
Base system (e.g. atom or Core i5) | 18W |
4x 2Tb (e.g. Samsung EcoGreen F3) | 19W |
RAID Cartão (e.g. Areca 1220) | 5W |
1x 120mm Case / HDD Fan (e.g. Nexus Real Silent 120mm) | 1W |
TOTAL | 43W |
Using the above figures, I estimate that a new system with a similar role and capability to what I have will consume just under 45watts at idle.
For a typical low spec (450w) PSU, this load is only 10%. At this low a load a typical PSU can be quite inefficient. O ATX specification requires 70% efficiency at 20% of rated power, but a 43W draw is below 20% rated power for all PSU’s rated for 250W or above (in effect all PSU'S). Below is a comparison between a bare minimum ATX PSU and a few highly efficient PSU'S.
The figure for the generic PSU is based on the minimum requirement and is therefore a worst case. Even with a very poor efficiency PSU the AC draw from the wall won’t increase as the DC draw decreases. I have calculated a best-case yearly saving, based on a kWh charge of 10p and assuming 24.7 usage.
Make / Model | Efficiency at 43W | leste. Total power draw (idle) | Saving |
ATX v2.2 250w ATX | 70% (at 50W) | 61W | |
Seasonic X‑400 | 80.4% (at 42.6W) | 53W | £6.97 |
Corsair AX850 | 77.3% (at 43W) | 55W | £5.09 |
Enermax Modu87+ 500w | 77.5% (at 43.4W) | 56W | £5.21 |
Corsair CX400W | 73.2% (at 43.2W) | 59W | £2.35 |
Sparkle Power SPI220LE FlexATX 220W | 80.5% (at 42.4w) | 53W | £7.02 |
HuntKey Jumper R90 300W 80+ Gold | 85% (at 30w) | 51W | £9.50 |
Conclusion: For a low power system it is cheaper, and probably more environmentally sound to keep (or re-use) an existing power supply than to replace it with a high power model, even if the new model is very efficient.
Atualizar (25-Dec-2011)
Corrected a calculation error and added the HuntKey Jumper R90. Even a very good value, highly efficient PSU can’t change the conclusion much in this scenario — the savings are just far too small to justify the cost (and environmental cost) of a new PSU. The HuntKey would take in excess of 3 years to pay for itself, and this is in an ideal scenario, compared to a a worth case scenario PSU! For an even lower power system (e.g. a AMD E350) the savings would be lower still. Even a “perfect” PSU would only net savings of around £16 a year!
“Hi James I realise it has been a long while, but I just checked this on windows 11 (build 23H2)…”