Ci sono un sacco di recensioni là fuori a confronto gli ultimi cellulari, le ultime tavolette e gli ultimi notebook, ma molto pochi mai numero d'ordine qualcosa di più 18 Vecchio di mesi. La maggior parte delle persone non aggiorna il proprio kit così frequentemente, il che rende i confronti piuttosto inutili. Nell'arco di 4-5 anni, che è un ciclo di aggiornamento più tipico per la maggior parte delle persone, si sono verificati enormi cambiamenti nella potenza di calcolo disponibile.
In June 2008 I was asked for help to choose a device for a family member which would meet basic online and app needs whilst being as portable as possible. The Asus eeePC 700 had been released a year earlier and the new 901 with the new Intel Atom processor had just become available. It did everything required — capable of running Windows XP, with wireless‑n and at around 1Kg it was just powerful enough, and impressively portable. Battery life was way beyond anything else comparable and could only be matched by spending an order of magnitude more.
Jump to June 2012 — a scant 4 years later and my mobile phone contract expires. After long deliberations I eventually opted for the Samsung Galaxy S3 over the HTC One X. Having spet considerable time looking at specs it dawned on me that superficially it had specs not all that dissimilar to the good old eeePC. Always interested in the progress of these things I did a quick comparison
Asus eeePC 901 | Samsung Galaxy S3 | |
---|---|---|
Date of release | Jun-08 | May-12 |
Screen resolution | 1024×600 | 720× 1280 |
RAM | 1Gb | 1Gb |
immagazzinamento | 20Gb | 16–64Gb |
CPU | DualThread 1.6GHz | QuadCore 1.4GHz |
senza fili | 802.11n (draft) | 802.11n |
weight | 1140g | 133g |
dimensions | 225 x 165 x 35 | 137 x 71 x 9 |
HDMI produzione | No | sì |
macchina fotografica | 1.3mpix | 8mpix |
The specs speak for themselves. The phone is much thinner, lighter and more powerful. It comes with comparable storage and RAM and has better connectivity and a better camera. The eeePC is of course still much more suitable for working on word or excel documents, but it isn’t all that great for that itself.
I suspect that most eeePC’s were, like the one in my case, bought for basic internet access. Modern smartphones have made this function completely redundant. People needing to do serious document work aren’t likely to opt for a netbook either — an ultrabook or similar notebook is far more likely to be deemed suitable because you just can’t get away from needing a good size physical screen and real keyboard. Whilst the demise of the netbook due to tablets was much exaggerated, I believe the modern smartphone really will put an end to the netbook market almost completely.
“Hi James I realise it has been a long while, but I just checked this on windows 11 (build 23H2)…”