Following on from the slight surprise that a new 电源供应器 is a poor investment for a low power PC I decided I’d reassure myself that an efficient 电源供应器 is a good investment for a typical “enthusiast” PC.
To do this depends on the configuration, how much time the PC spends on, and how much time it spends being heavily utilised. I’m basing this on a fairly-high power single-GPU system with a Core i7 CPU and a Radeon 5870. I’m also going to assume the system is operated from 3pm — 11pm weekdays and 9am — 1am weekends, making for a total of 72 hours a week. I’ll also assume the system spends 50% time idle and 50% full-load.
该 system in question pulls ~80w idle and ~340w under full load. Finding efficiencies for this is tricky, so the value will be rounded up to 400w (the 电源供应器’s in question don’t vary greatly between 300w and 400w)
All of these estimates are deliberately on the high side. I expect a typical PC will spend more time off, more time idle, and wont be loaded as intensely as the example. Most systems also use lower power CPU’s and GPU’s too.
The figure for the generic 电源供应器 is based on the minimum requirement and is therefore a worst case. Even with a very poor efficiency 电源供应器 the AC draw from the wall won’t increase as the DC draw decreases. I have calculated a best-case yearly saving, based on a kWh charge of 10p.
|使 / 模型||Efficiency at idle (80w ^)||Efficiency at load (340w ^)||东方. A.C. power draw at idle||东方. A.C. power draw at load||Saving|
|ATX v2.2 400w||65% (at 80w)||70% (at 400w)||123w ^||486w ^|
|Seasonic X‑400||85.4% (at 90.4w)||89.9% (at 400w)||94w ^||378w ^||£25.63|
|Corsair AX850||83.5% (at 90w)||89% (at 400w)||96w ^||382w ^||£24.52|
|Enermax Modu87+ 500w||85.9% (at 88.5w)||87.6% (at 400w)||93w ^||388w ^||£23.87|
|Corsair CX400W||81.2% (at 90.2w)||81.5% (at 400w)||99w ^||417w ^||£17.43|
|Kingwin Lazer Platinum 550W||92.1% (at 91.2w)||92.9% (at 400w)||87w ^||366w ^||£29.19|
|HuntKey Jumper R90 300W 80+ 金||88% (at 60w)||86% (at 330w)||87w ^||366w ^||£23.17|
A new 电源供应器 in this scenario is probably not advisable on a financial only basis. Even with quite a lot of heavy use, and comparing the most efficient 电源供应器’s with the worst a budget ATX 电源供应器 can perform the saving will take around 5 years to recoup. A real world upgrade is unlikely to net this much saving.
If you are considering replacing an existing 电源供应器 my advice would be not to bother, unless you have additional reasons. If you are buying new then it is worth paying more for a better 电源供应器, within reason. Of course if you want the efficiency for other reasons (low noise, low heat) then those factors may make the value difference irrelevant.
Added the HuntKey Jumper R90. Whilst it is sold as a 300W 电源供应器, it does work slightly above spec, especially if well cooled. This 电源供应器 does make a bit of different to the conclusions. It produces savings of over £20, which is a significant proportion of the price of the 电源供应器! A payback period of 2 年, with an expectation that electricity prices will continue to rise would certainly be worth thinking about. However, the HuntKey isn’t specified high enough to really provide for the configuration specified in this scenario, and as such we couldn’t recommend running it beyond its rating.
有你自己的一些想法? 下面放纵自己通过评论! 如果您想订阅，请使用菜单上的订阅链接右上方. 您还可以通过使用下面的链接社会分享这与你的朋友. 干杯.