0Yham DSP-E800ロゴお使いのPCからハイエンドの音を取得

多くの人々のために, 音や無音のどちらかがあります, 品質は本当にそれに付属していません. 他人のために, 仕様と自慢する権利ルール: ビットレート, サンプリング周波数, 帯域幅, パワーハンドリング。多くの場合、PCのスピーカーの簡単なセットは、非常にうまくやるだろう, がある場合は特に 6 それらの以上 (以上が優れている, 右?)  お使いのコンピュータから素晴らしいサウンドをしたい場合しかし、あなたは何をしますか?  あなたは予算上のオーディオマニアであれば、あなたは何をしますか?  あなたがゲームをプレイして欲しい場合は、サラウンドサウンドが、同じシステムを介して音楽を再生する何?  そこに多くの選択肢があり、これは非常に高価で複雑得ることができる, それは必要はありません.

Enter the Yamaha DSP-E800. Here’s a mod­ern clas­sic, a piece of hi-fi that is in some ways rather dated and yet seems to have no suc­cessor from Yamaha or any oth­er com­pany. I’m talk­ing about a high-end sound­ing, budget-priced sur­round pro­cessor and 3-chan­nel amp that has been doing the rounds for years. This is a niche mar­ket, a product that only does part of the over­all job, blend­ing into your 2-chan­nel sys­tem without intro­du­cing com­prom­ise. You simply con­nect the main chan­nel out­puts to your exist­ing 2-chan­nel amp or pre-amp and you have 5.1 chan­nel func­tion­al­ity — just add some more speak­ers and plumb into the digit­al out­put of your sound-card (it has both optic­al and coaxi­al inputs).  I per­son­ally use one with some basic 1990s book­shelf speak­ers as rears and set the centre chan­nel to “none” to allow my ste­reo speak­ers to do all the hard work. I know three oth­er people who use the Yammy — all superb setups, one very expens­ive — and none of them can even think of a way to move away from it without spend­ing the large mon­ies.

Some sound-cards won’t give you a Dolby Digit­al (nev­er mind DTS) sig­nal and mine was only on the cusp of want­ing to do this. Being the cheapest full-chip­set X-fi avail­able when I bought it, I had to pay Cre­at­ive a few pounds to enable Dolby Digit­al Live sup­port. I’m glad I did as it works very nicely. DVDの, 大きなファイルサイズのムービー, Call of Duty and many oth­er games all work very well with this set-up. You just have to accept that you won’t be able to digit­ally stream True­HD or oth­er formats that were developed way after the Yamaha was born. To be hon­est, しかし, with the new­er formats (SACD, DVD-A, True­HD, DTS-MA…) it’s easy to sur­pass those expect­a­tions of excel­lent sound with the old ones — DD 5.1, DTS, Red­book CD オーディオなど. — if your play­back sys­tem offers suf­fi­cient fidel­ity. I have heard at least one 1990s mod­el CD play­er that can sur­pass sev­er­al thou­sand pound’s worth of SACD hard­ware, when play­ing equally excel­lent lay­ers of the same hybrid Linn SACD/CD.  私はこれ以上言わないだろう.

あなたの中の時間****** Eについて, upgrades are more than pos­sible. Re-clock­ing, improved voltage reg­u­la­tion, bet­ter capa­cit­ors and op-amps will make the most of the DSP-E800, though I have to say it sounds great as stand­ard. In terms of 2-chan­nel music it’s roughly on a par with two or three hun­dred pounds’ worth of CD play­er when fed from some­thing like a Sound­blaster X-Fi, though I’m quite sure most digit­al sources will work sim­il­arly well. Com­pared to the X-fi’s ana­logue out­puts it is slightly ahead — both being in stand­ard, unmo­les­ted trim — giv­ing a pleas­ingly warm and con­cise account of your source mater­i­al, albeit with slightly con­strained dynam­ics.

So why the review of what in com­put­ing terms seems as old as the hillsWell it’s excel­lent and every time I’ve looked they’re avail­able on Ebay, £50ほどの少しのために行くいくつかの.

あなた自身のいくつかの考えを持って? コメントに下記をお楽しみください! あなたが購読したい場合は、右上のメニューで購読リンクをご利用ください. また、下記の社会的なリンクを使用してお友達とこれを共有することができます. 乾杯.

返信を残します