1Mozilla Minefield x64The case for x64 browsers?

I’ve recently been using Fire­fox 4 64bit pre­b­eta, also known as Mine­field. I thought it would be inter­est­ing to com­pare vari­ous browsers to see if this sup­ports my feel­ing that Mine­field is the fast­est browser I’ve used. The con­clu­sions are quite inter­est­ing. I will con­tin­ue to update this table as new ver­sions are released

火狐 4 x64の (pre beta7)火狐 3.6Fire­fox 4 betaIE9 betaIE9 beta x64IE8IE8 x64クロムオペラサファリ
ACID 39794979595100100100
Peace keep­er
How To Cre­ate CSS テスト118ミズ138ミズ98ミズ209ミズ254ミズ234ミズ235ミズN / A49ミズN / A
Sun Spider JavaScript433.0ミズ ± 10.6%707.0ミズ ± 4.6%441.4ミズ ± 8.8%337.6ミズ ± 7.6%1148.4ミズ ± 3.4%283.0ミズ ± 11.4%251.0ミズ ± 15.0%268.2ミズ ± 3.6%
JS Celt­ic Kan411 ± 7200 ± 7325 ± 20491 ± 34185 ± 276 ± 641 ± 4722 ± 6639 ±5553 ± 9
Slick Speed262251
Task Speed380252423588エラーエラー1676619098266221332339
MS Fishtank37FPS (1000 fish)13FPS (100fish)26FPS (1000 fish)54FPS (1000 fish)46FPS (1000 fish)20FPS (10 fish)28FPS (100 fish)30FPS (1 fish)
MS Psyche- delic1774rpm3rpm1779rpm1810rpm1779rpm8rpm8rpm
Moz­illa Kraken7842.5 ミズ ± 0.7%21388.8 ミズ ± 0.3%16289.7 ミズ ± 0.9%15228.5 ミズ ± 0.2%11079.4 ミズ ± 1.0%15002.3 ミズ ± 0.4%
Google V8
Non Troppo Table test
1500 Flash Particles47FPS46FPS45FPS40FPS40FPS
100 SVG Particles75FPS78FPS125FPS37FPS65FPS
100 HTML5 Particles46FPS48FPS100FPSエラー65FPS


  • Mine­field cur­rently crashes when run­ning Peace­keep­er. This should be fixed in the next build.
  • Neither Fire­fox nor IE are quite able to com­plete the ACID3 test correctly.
  • It seems that Opera has by far the best JavaS­cript engine, but I know from exper­i­ence that its page load times are not good, and I don’t like the way it renders fonts.
  • Chrome and Safari are very close in per­form­ance and are the fast­est over­all for JavaS­cript if Opera is ruled out for slow data load times.
  • Chrome is fast­est over­all for SVG and HTML5 hard­ware accel­er­a­tion. It is also the fast­est for flash (exc. 64ビット), and very close to Mine­field. Once Chrome has full hard­ware accel­er­a­tion it will be indis­put­ably the fast­est (unless Mine­field improves its JS engine by release time)
  • インターネットエクスプローラ 8 is a waste of time.
  • IE9 is a big improve­ment on IE8, but still lags well behind the rest.
  • IE9 x64 is slower than IE9 x86 — a case of poor optimisation?
  • It’s now obvi­ous why MS made IE 32bit the default browser in windows.
  • 火狐 4 looks to be a lot faster than fire­fox 3.6, but still slower with most javas­cript than Opera (altho the Moz­illa Kraken bench­mark which seems most strenu­ous gives Fire­fox an advant­age. How fair and inde­pend­ent are the vari­ous tests?)
  • Hard­ware accel­er­a­tion is clearly the future whenev­er it an be utilised.
  • 64bit fire­fox 4 is sub­stan­tially faster than 32bit fore­fox 4 in a few bench­marks, but on par or a bit behind in most. Par­tially this is prob­ably due to the nature of its pre­b­eta status, com­pared to 32bit fire­fox 4 being near final release. It also high­lights that many things do not bene­fit from x64 yet.
  • 火狐 4 looks to be the most roun­ded browser at this moment. Hope­fully an offi­cial release of Mine­field will improve upon this. Chrome is a very respect­able second. Once Chrome gets full hard­ware accel­er­a­tion it will sur­pass Firefox

これが有用であることが判明? 以下のコメントをドロップすることによって、私たちに知らせてください. あなたが購読したい場合は、右上のメニューで購読リンクをご利用ください. また、下記の社会的なリンクを使用してお友達とこれを共有することができます. 乾杯.


1 コメント


Thanks for your bench­marks. I’m run­ning only 64 bit browsers on my Win­dows 7 machine and have been pretty happy with them. IE8 is OK, but for me IE9 does­n’t work at all. I hate that you can­’t install them side-by-side, makes check­ing them back to back impossible. ところで, I’m run­ning Mine­field 4.0b8pre, just installed today from the nightly Moz­illa builds. It seems faster to me than the 64 ビット 3.6.12, but its dif­fi­cult to be object­ive. Now that flash and Java are both usable in 64 bit there’s no reas­on not to plunge ahead with the the browsers. Peace, ジョン