DIY मीडिया होम लोगो

अपनी खुद की होम थिएटर और हाय-Fi सेटअप डिजाइन और बनाने के लिए परम साइट.

0नई छवि संपीड़न उपकरण का परीक्षण

I’ve been using EWWW image optim­iser to com­press all of my जेपीईजी तथा पीएनजी images on this site for sev­er­al years. EWWW makes use of OptiPng and PngOut and whilst these are power­ful tools there are altern­at­ives out there now that I wanted to test and compare.

I am aware of new­er image formats that may offer smal­ler sizes but until they are broadly sup­por­ted we will have to con­tin­ue to work with पीएनजी तथा जेपीईजी.

I have already seen some com­par­is­ons show­ing some impress­ive per­form­ance by some oth­er formats but I wanted to test this for myself with my real­world images. Based on the claims presen­ted I decided to start with Pingo and see how much it reduced the size of my total image library.

वहाँ रहे हैं 3549 छवियों जो PNG का का मिश्रण हैं, JPEGs, and Webp files and range in size from over 1000×1000 pixels to small thumb­nails of 60×60 pixels.

दोषरहित

आकार
Ori­gin­al116एमबी (121,848,736 बाइट्स)
Pingo के बाद113एमबी (118,310,160 बाइट्स)

3505 images were pro­cessed in 434 seconds which is impress­ively quick com­pared to the pre­vi­ous tools I’ve used. कैसे कभी, केवल 3455kb (3.37एमबी) बचा लिया गया था जो एक है 2.5% बचत.

Des­pite the lack of reduc­tion, I will still be look­ing to migrate to pingo as it is vastly faster than the tools used by EWWW and achieves effect­ively the same result

हानिपूर्ण

आकार
Ori­gin­al116एमबी (121,848,736 बाइट्स)
Pingo के बाद94एमबी (98,133,668 बाइट्स)

Lossy com­pres­sion was much more impress­ive in size reduc­tion with a 22.6Mb (19%) reduc­tion but this is to be expec­ted as my pre­vi­ous tools were not using lossy com­pres­sion. I had decided in advance that a sig­ni­fic­ant reduc­tion would be needed for me to con­sider using lossy com­pres­sion. This reduc­tion is right on the bor­der­line. The ulti­mate decision comes down to how much the smal­ler dimen­sion (अधिक बार प्रस्तुत) images saved — the major­ity of the sav­ings were with ori­gin­al images not with the smal­ler images so I’m not per­suaded that the reduc­tion is worth­while at this point, espe­cially as I already serve webp images to over 50% of vis­it­ors and these gained the least

The next step is to fig­ure out how to auto­mate the pro­cess with pingo which isn’t sup­por­ted by EWWW.

Leave a Reply