DIY میڈیا ہوم علامت

اپنے گھر تھیٹر اور ہائی فائی سیٹ اپ کے ڈیزائن اور پیدا کرنے کے لئے الٹی سائٹ.

0نئی تصویر سمپیڑن اوزار جانچ

I’ve been using EWWW image optim­iser to com­press all of my JPEG اور PNG images on this site for sev­er­al years. EWWW makes use of OptiPng and PngOut and whilst these are power­ful tools there are altern­at­ives out there now that I wanted to test and com­pare.


I am aware of new­er image formats that may offer smal­ler sizes but until they are broadly sup­por­ted we will have to con­tin­ue to work with PNG اور JPEG.

I have already seen some com­par­is­ons show­ing some impress­ive per­form­ance by some oth­er formats but I wanted to test this for myself with my real­world images. Based on the claims presen­ted I decided to start with Pingo and see how much it reduced the size of my total image lib­rary.

ہیں 3549 PNGs کے کا ایک مرکب ہیں جس کی تصاویر, JPEGs کے, and Webp files and range in size from over 1000×1000 pixels to small thumb­nails of 60×60 pixels.

ثابت

سائز
Ori­gin­al116MB (121,848,736 بائٹس)
Pingo کی بعد113MB (118,310,160 بائٹس)

3505 images were pro­cessed in 434 seconds which is impress­ively quick com­pared to the pre­vi­ous tools I’ve used. کس طرح کبھی, صرف 3455kb (3.37بی) ایک ہے جو بچایا گیا تھا 2.5% sav­ing.

Des­pite the lack of reduc­tion, I will still be look­ing to migrate to pingo as it is vastly faster than the tools used by EWWW and achieves effect­ively the same res­ult

کی lossy

سائز
Ori­gin­al116MB (121,848,736 بائٹس)
Pingo کی بعد94MB (98,133,668 بائٹس)

Lossy com­pres­sion was much more impress­ive in size reduc­tion with a 22.6Mb (19%) reduc­tion but this is to be expec­ted as my pre­vi­ous tools were not using lossy com­pres­sion. I had decided in advance that a sig­ni­fic­ant reduc­tion would be needed for me to con­sider using lossy com­pres­sion. This reduc­tion is right on the bor­der­line. The ulti­mate decision comes down to how much the smal­ler dimen­sion (زیادہ کثرت سے خدمات انجام دیں) images saved — the major­ity of the sav­ings were with ori­gin­al images not with the smal­ler images so I’m not per­suaded that the reduc­tion is worth­while at this point, espe­cially as I already serve webp images to over 50% of vis­it­ors and these gained the least

The next step is to fig­ure out how to auto­mate the pro­cess with pingo which isn’t sup­por­ted by EWWW.

Think we've missed something? Let us know by commenting below. آپ کے سبسکرائب کرنا چاہتے ہیں تو سب سے اوپر دائیں مینو پر لنک سبسکرائب استعمال کریں. آپ بھی ذیل سماجی روابط کا استعمال کرتے ہوئے کی طرف سے اپنے دوستوں کے ساتھ اس کا اشتراک کر سکتے ہیں. چیرس.

جواب چھوڑیں