0PSU LogoLow power PC — new or old PSU

I have a serv­er that oper­ates 24.7. It occurred to me that I may be able to save some money on elec­tri­city bills if I could reduce its power con­sump­tion. It already has a low power AMD Sem­pron LE-1100 CPU so the power draw of the sys­tem should be quite low, but the PSU is quite old and not espe­cially effi­cient. This got me think­ing about Power sup­plies designed for low power sys­tems. There are plenty of 80+ cer­ti­fied PSU’s out there with 500+ watt rat­ings, but are these actu­ally worth the invest­ment for a low power sys­tem?

My sys­tem spends most of its time idle so I decided I’d work out the power draw would be if I were to build a new sys­tem with cur­rent com­pon­ents to do it’s job..
Base sys­tem (e.g. atom or Core i5)18W
4x 2Tb (e.g. Sam­sung Eco­Green F3)19W
RAID Card (e.g. Areca 1220)5W
1x 120mm Case / HDD Fan (e.g. Nex­us Real Silent 120mm)1W

Using the above fig­ures, I estim­ate that a new sys­tem with a sim­il­ar role and cap­ab­il­ity to what I have will con­sume just under 45watts at idle.

For a typ­ic­al low spec (450w) PSU, this load is only 10%. At this low a load a typ­ic­al PSU can be quite inef­fi­cient. The ATX spe­cific­a­tion requires 70% effi­ciency at 20% of rated power, but a 43W draw is below 20% rated power for all PSU’s rated for 250W or above (in effect all PSU’s). Below is a com­par­is­on between a bare min­im­um ATX PSU and a few highly effi­cient PSU’s.

The fig­ure for the gen­er­ic PSU is based on the min­im­um require­ment and is there­fore a worst case. Even with a very poor effi­ciency PSU the AC draw from the wall won’t increase as the DC draw decreases. I have cal­cu­lated a best-case yearly sav­ing, based on a kWh charge of 10p and assum­ing 24.7 usage.

Make / Mod­elEffi­ciency at 43WEst. Total power draw (idle)Sav­ing
ATX v2.2 250w ATX70% (at 50W)61W
Season­ic X-40080.4% (at 42.6W)53W£6.97
Cor­sair AX85077.3% (at 43W)55W£5.09
Ener­max Modu87+ 500w77.5% (at 43.4W)56W£5.21
Cor­sair CX400W73.2% (at 43.2W)59W£2.35
Sparkle Power SPI220LE Flex­ATX 220W80.5% (at 42.4w)53W£7.02
HuntKey Jump­er R90 300W 80+ Gold85% (at 30w)51W£9.50

Con­clu­sion: For a low power sys­tem it is cheap­er, and prob­ably more envir­on­ment­ally sound to keep (or re-use) an exist­ing power sup­ply than to replace it with a high power mod­el, even if the new mod­el is very effi­cient.

Update (25-Dec-2011)

Cor­rec­ted a cal­cu­la­tion error and added the HuntKey Jump­er R90.  Even a very good value, highly effi­cient PSU can’t change the con­clu­sion much in this scen­ario — the sav­ings are just far too small to jus­ti­fy the cost (and envir­on­ment­al cost) of a new PSU.  The HuntKey would take in excess of 3 years to pay for itself, and this is in an ideal scen­ario, com­pared to a a worth case scen­ario PSU!  For an even lower power sys­tem (e.g. a AMD E350) the sav­ings would be lower still.  Even a “per­fect” PSU would only net sav­ings of around £16 a year!

Please send us your thoughts by commenting below! If you would like to subscribe please use the subscribe link on the menu at the top right. You can also share this with your friends by using the social links below. Cheers.

Leave a Reply